The current legislative process toward the passing of "healthcare reform" has been highly problematic for a mulititude of reasons, but the top four need to be highlighted yet again:
* Members of Congress are being asked to vote on things that they have not fully read through or even allowed the voting public to review.
* The Constitutionality of the legislation (both in content and in procedure) has been dubious at best.
* Forget compromise and and old-fashion horse trading - we are witnessing out and out whoring of members of Congress for the sake of securing votes (at the expense of the taxpayers' dime to boot).
* The ability to enhance or otherwise repeal said legislation by future Congresses has been severely handicapped thanks to hidden, lawyerly passages purposed stowed away in the bill.
Lest my friends on the other side of the aisle think I am being unreasonable about all of this, consider the following: how would you feel if the subject matter was about ___ and the President at the end of the sausage making process was a Republican?
This goes beyond ideology, it is all about the whole process of governance.
Never again will *any* election be considered routine. Lines have been crossed in such a way that I suspect that a Constitutional convention within our lifetimes is not only required, but inevitable, if only to make certain that such actions never happen again.
2010 is going to be an interesting year, but not for the reasons that Arthur C. Clarke thought.